Red Flag Warning expires at 10:00 AM on 6/20, issued at 10:00 AM Maricopa, CA

Voters will decide whether to keep or kill state's death penalty

Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 9/25/2012 7:02 pm
"When a person commits a murder like that, the only fair, just, and appropriate penalty is a penalty of death," says Deputy District Attorney Arthur Norris. He spoke about a death penalty case he tried where 90-year-old Thelma Long was beaten to death with a baseball bat in 2007. Her killer, Timothy Rodriguez, was sentenced to death two years ago.

“It was a nightmare," Norris says. “There was blood everywhere. Thelma was leaned up against a counter, and you can tell by the blood spatter pattern that Timothy Rodriguez had continued swinging that bat over and over while she was down. She was a 90-year-old woman, and he's doing this stuff to her. I mean who does that?"

Norris along with Kern County Sheriff Donny Youngblood and District Attorney Lisa Green met in downtown Bakersfield Tuesday to urge voters not to support Proposition 34.

“Prop. 34 is a corrupt proposal that puts my officers in jeopardy and short changes crime victims,” Sheriff Youngblood says. “Don't you think when a suspect rapes or murders a child that the suspect should get the ultimate penalty?”

Prop. 34 would abolish the death penalty, making the maximum sentence for people guilty of murder, life in prison without the possibility of parole. There are 22 people from Kern County currently on death row.

Vincent Brothers is one of them. The former school vice principal was convicted of killing his wife, their three children, and his mother-in-law in their southeast Bakersfield home in 2003.

"Very emotional case for a lot of people who knew the Harper family,” Green says. “Over 2,000 people attended the funeral.”

Supporters of Prop. 34 say the death penalty is too expensive and ineffective.

“At some point, you just think having the penalty isn’t worth the cost because, in effect, we have a death penalty where a lot of people are sentenced to it, but very few people get executed,” says Michael Lukehart, a criminal defense attorney in Bakersfield. "In my entire legal career, I’ve been watching people trying to make the death penalty quicker and more efficient, and all they've succeeded in doing is build layer upon layer upon layer of delay in the system."

Lukehart says each death penalty case can run into seven figures easily.
 
While those against the proposition say it could save taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars.

"It’s not been proven actually when the proponents talk about cost that it costs more to impose the death penalty,” Green says. “There's no reliable study that says that."

Lukehart says, “When you start adding the defense cost, the prosecution cost, the court cost and the costs to the law enforcement budgets that they devote extra resources to the death penalty, it’s expensive.”

According to Proposition 34, about $1 million will be funneled into a fund for law enforcement to investigate cold cases, but Green says that money would come from the general fund where there isn't any money.

"The system is definitely broken, and, in that sense, it has failed,” she says. “But it can be fixed, and there are people working to fix it. So instead of totally abolishing it, people should get together and fix it."
Share
6 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of KGET TV 17 - In the Spirit of the Golden Empire

CBernstien - 9/26/2012 10:35 PM
0 Votes
The 729 on death row murdered at least 1,279 people, with 230 children. 43 were police officers. 211 victims were raped and 319 of them robbed. 66 were killed in execution style and 47 were tortured. 11 murdered other inmates. No “savings.” Alleged savings ignore increased life-time medical costs for aging inmates and require decreased security levels and housing 2-3 inmates per cell rather than one. Rather than spending 23 hours/day in their cell, inmates will be required to work. These changes will lead to increased violence for other inmates and guards and prove unworkable for these killers. No “accountability.” Max earnings for any inmate would amount to $383/year (assuming 100% of earnings went to victims), divided by number of qualifying victims. Hardly accounts for murdering a loved one. No “full enforcement” as 729 inmates do not receive penalty given them by jurors. Also, for the 34,000 inmates serving life sentences, there will be NO increased penalty for killing a guard or another inmate. They’re already serving a life sentence. Liberals are also trying to get rid of life sentences. (Human Rights Watch, Old Behind Bars, 2012.) This would lead to possible paroles for not only the 729 on death row, but the 34,000 other serving life sentences. Remember Charles Manson, Sirhan Sirhan, Darryl Thomas Kemp, Kenneth Allen McDuff, and Bennie Demps? Arguments of innocence bogus. Can’t identify 1 innocent person executed in CA. Can’t identify 1 person on CA’s death row who has exhausted his appeals and has a plausible claim of innocence. See http://cadeathpenalty.webs.com/

Robo Cop - 9/26/2012 6:20 PM
0 Votes
Face the facts only 16 people on Death Row have been executed in the last 30 some years & there's over what 700 people waiting to be executed if I heard the news correctly? That's a joke! Our death penalty in reality is more like a life sentence without parole & taxpayers would save millions if we didn't have to go through all the appeals. So even thou I'd like to keep the death penalty in force I don't think it works Maybe someone needs to get the politicians to pass new laws to expedite executions

ginny - 9/26/2012 9:33 AM
4 Votes
We don't need to abolish the Death Penalty, what we need is a Judicial System with the cajones to see that they are carried out in a timely manner.

proudamerican - 9/25/2012 8:45 PM
6 Votes
We don't need to abolish the death penalty, we need to abolish the endless appeals that drag on for decades. Guilty of capital murder? Great, get sentenced to death. Get one mandatory appeal for a panel of judges to review the case (within six months of the sentencing date). If those judges conclude the original trial was within the scope of the law, then the accused hangs at sundown that Friday night. Case closed, victim's families can get on with their lives.

RVLADY - 9/25/2012 7:53 PM
5 Votes
How can it be cheaper to keep them in prison the rest of thier life???? No they should be put to death!I know it won't bring who they killed back, but would give families closuer!

murph56 - 9/25/2012 7:16 PM
5 Votes
Oh yes death row, now what is death row in the state of California? Nothing more than a listing on ones head of which is never carried out! If these people would be marched out of court and hung on the spot the problem would be solved for the tax payers and the prison system!
Bakersfield Current Conditions
72° High: 87°  |  Low: 57°
Clear
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.