Reduced retirement pension proposed for new Bakersfield city workers

Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 2/04/2010 8:45 pm
There are proposals on the table that could roll back the pension benefits of Bakersfield city employees. Councilmembers Zack Scrivner and David Couch would like to scale back retirement benefits for newly hired city employees.

Scrivner says retirement benefits cost city taxpayers $25 million a year, which he says is too much.

"What I'm proposing is that for new hired employees, we go back to the pension level that we've had in 2000-2001," said Scrivner.

New general employee hires currently get 2.7 percent of their salary, with retirement at age 55. Scrivner's proposal would make it two percent with retirement at age 55.

Safety employees, such as police and fire currently get three percent at 50. Scrivner wants to cut that to two percent at age 50.

The local Service Employees International Union has an existing contract with the city and it doesn't want a change.

"We've basically been advised by counsel that it would be unwise for us to open our contract," said local SEIU president Billy Owens.

City Council will discuss the issue at its February 17 meeting and will have to decide whether this proposition should go to ballot. They need four votes to move forward.


Share
7 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of KGET TV 17 - In the Spirit of the Golden Empire

jmabbott888 - 2/10/2010 4:25 PM
I have an idea, tell the unions to shove it & the city hire non-union people that get paid the equal of what their job would be in the private sector. That way you get a reasonable paycheck & no one becomes a fatcat like the unions do now. Save the taxpayers money & employ some people, also if you don't do your job you can be fired, unlike now you have 3 or 4 watching 1 work & we pay all of them.

jhodge - 2/9/2010 6:44 AM
OK how does 2 or 3% retirement compare to what a congress person gets? How about a governor, a major, an assembly person, a school board executive, a prison guard, and the list goes on. How about Mark's retirement package? Talk about unsustainablle, our government pensions, perks and benefits are out of control.

DarthDuh - 2/5/2010 2:50 PM
Luke, the only ones being RAKED are the tax payers to support a pension system that is NOT SUSTAINABLE. Do they want nice pensions or to be able to keep their jobs?

lukewonderly - 2/5/2010 11:15 AM
This is only PART - of a concerted effort - to further remove and to reduce American standard(s) of living - while the Bankers and investment firms - rake in BILLIONS OF DOLLARS - redirecting ALL WEALTH - back to them. Change the direction of humanity: http://www.zmbakersfield.com/thevenusproject

DarthDuh - 2/5/2010 10:40 AM
The problem is, the pots already overflowing and stinking up the bathroom. Have you ever tried to close the lid on a clogged toilet? And the SEIU doesn't think the **stuff** stinks, so why call a plumber?

Average Schmo - 2/5/2010 9:32 AM
There are several PERS retirement plans. I think they (unions) are wanting to go to one that's in between what Scrivner is proposing and the current one they have. It would require employees staying/contributing another 5 years on average. Seems to me that government/City Council ought to let the unions decide if they want the retirement or the salary... you can't have both in these tough times so let them decide how to divy up their pot of money between salary/health/retirement. It all comes out of one pot anyway... the real objective is to keep a lid on the pot.

DarthDuh - 2/5/2010 9:08 AM
I guess sustainability is not a concern of the fat cats at SEIU. The only thing worse than corporate greed is union greed.
Bakersfield Current Conditions
61° High: 63°  |  Low: 54°
Partly Cloudy
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.