Medical marijuana supporters look at legal options to overturn Measure G

Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 6/07/2012 8:59 am
Medical marijuana dispensaries in Kern County are already looking at legal loopholes to overturn Measure G. Sixty nine percent of voters in Tuesday's Primary voted yes on the measure, meaning the stores will have to move.

"What do we do? How can this happen?," said attorney Phil Ganong quoting questions he's received from both medical marijuana patients and associations.

Ganong, who has supported patient associations and their clients, says patients are stressed out and those who manage the shops are asking him what they can do.

"We're certainly looking at legal challenges and we think that there are some. We are going to be meeting next week with the general managers that want to be involved and see if they want to create a general legal expense fund and start a joint action to try and test the legality of this measure," said Ganong.

With the passing of Measure G, 23 medicinal marijuana shops will have to move to unincorporated areas. They have to be a mile away from schools, churches, public parks, daycares, and each other. Ganong doesn't think there's enough room for all of the shops to meet those requirements.

"It's going to cost the county money, some more money. It's unfortunate because the whole effect of Measure G is going to force lawful organizations that created jobs and tax revenue for local and statewide entities, improve neighborhoods in spite of some people's contentions to the contrary. It's going to drive all of that legal activity underground and probably back into organized crime," said Ganong.

And, Ganong doesn't think landlords will rent to the dispensaries because, he says, property owners will have to acknowledge that they know they are renting to a medical marijuana facility. Ganong says property owners fear that could lead to a federal seizure of the buildings. Ganong believes that is unconstitutional, violating the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. He might use that to fight and overturn the measure.

"We think the requirement of having land owners, in essence, signing a confession letter or a confession consent saying hey, this I'm going to allow a medicinal cannabis patient association to rent from me with full knowledge that that is a crime under federal law, constitutes a waiver of that right. So, in order to have a permit that is permitted by the county they are requiring a land owner to waive that Fifth Amendment right," explained Ganong.

But, he's still not happy he has to make any challenge at all.

"I guess in a way I was hopeful. It was kind of like when I saw the results last night and then woke up this morning, it was kind of like I'd lost a loved one cause in a way my pride in my community had been hurt. I don't think it's really representative of the county's view," Ganong said, noting the voter turnout for the primary. "I think it was a very clever strategic call on the part of county counsel and the Board of Supervisors. But, I don't think the war is over."

Ganong believes once the results are certified and the ordinance is adopted, that's when county officials will notify the dispensaries that they have ten days to leave.
 
Share
23 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of KGET TV 17 - In the Spirit of the Golden Empire

BigDaddyVapor - 6/14/2012 11:30 PM
0 Votes
Have to love the ignorance from the Reefer Madness culture/generation. Funny, more of you should look into the option. It would cure your dependence on prescription drugs and alcohol, I'm sure in many hypocrites case. I am a veteran, right-wing, tea-party, Conservative. I did over a YEAR of research on Medicinal Marijuana, before I took the plunge. Its changed my life. Tell you what, any of you "OldMonikers" want to walk a mile in my shoes. Start with an ascending/descending aortic dissection. A single 6cm graft at the aortic arch. However, still living with a dissection that extends down BOTH carotids, to the top of my heart. Out the bottom of my heart, to BOTH kidneys, including a false lumen supplying blood to my right kidney. The dissection continues and stops, just before my right femoral artery. MMJ takes care of pain, helps control my BP (since my systolic can't go over 110, so I'm kept in a HYPO-tensive state. Helps with both anxiety and depression. Its helping control the pressure in my eyes, since the carotid dissections cause visual disturbances, vertigo and oncoming glaucoma. It helps me complete simple tasks, that many of you take for granted. All at 45 years old. Who the heck are you, to tell me how or what I can medicate with? You're going to tell me Federal Law? I can name a LOT of Federal Laws, you probably think are Un-Constitutional. I'm betting, most of you aren't big fans of either House, nor the current Poseur in Chief. So spare, you stupid Federal Law arguments. Alcohol used to be against the law to. We all know how that act of stupidity turned out.

BigDaddyVapor - 6/14/2012 11:16 PM
0 Votes
This crap was thrown together and dishonest in the way it was presented from the Council. Listen to the uniformed exit poll interviews. People didn't have any idea what they were voting for. The statement, that gives the City Council to change the ordinance at any point, without public approval, should get it thrown out, right there. That's the angle that should be taken.

TollHolio - 6/14/2012 9:45 AM
2 Votes
To be a part of Ganong's charade, it cost you 10 THOUSAND dollars a month. Yes, ten THOUSAND. And he had 25 dispensaries 'signed up'. I told him to go F himself. Yes, opposing measure G was a WINDFALL of cash for Jeff Ganong and his firm. To the tune of a QUARTER OF A MILLION DOLLARS A MONTH. Screw the public. Screw the elected officials. Jeff's got the lawyer machine (billable hours, folks) fired up, and he's ready to find a loophole to tell the MAJORITY (69 percent) of the voters that they are unimportant. Yes, I'm a medical user. I HATE you, Jeff Ganong. You're a money grubbing whore.

jmabbott888 - 6/10/2012 2:08 PM
0 Votes
I'm no doctor & haven't played one on tv but there seems to be a fair amonut of clinically proven adverse side effects to the herb, here is a link with cited reference to the adverse effects. www.webmd.com/mental-health/marijuana-use-and-its-effects

Natural Law - 6/10/2012 12:43 AM
0 Votes
Consuming marijuana is a right; all herbs are God-given for the purpose of restoring balance or healing disease. Government can regulate any herb as necessary to remedy any perceived harm, but cannot prohibit unless the harm is inherent in the herb. Use of marijuana has been shown not to be inherently harmful, so prohibition would violate natural law. The federal government has no power except what is specifically enumerated in the constitution. Regulation of health and welfare is not granted in the constitution and is reserved to the states. The federal government encroached on state rights via bastardization of the Commerce Clause (see http://planet.infowars.com/?p=52316), and such law can be nullified by the state. If you want a legal theory capable of overthrowing federal prohibition of marijuana based upon natural law, see www.NaturalLawRemedy.com.

Oldfart - 6/8/2012 7:55 AM
1 Vote
Aroused, what medical exam are you talking about, the young man of which I will not name that I know got this business card that they hand out on the street went to the address and walked out with his card, it took all of 5 minutes and he took no medial exam only was asked three questions and did not have to show a doctors report to verify any of it. As for buying it legally it is not legal as per federal law and federal law out rules state law folks.

Native1 - 6/7/2012 6:45 PM
1 Vote
We don't like the way that the public voted on this, so we are gonna sue!!!Who ever heard of such a thing? Imagine, letting the public vote to decide what they want! How un-american! Why do we even vote anymore? When one side loses, then they tie up the courts with their lawsuits. What a great system.

JimCee - 6/7/2012 6:16 PM
2 Votes
Since utilizing this medication (yes, MEDICATION), I have stopped drinking, stopped using tobacco, stopped ALL other prescription meds (blood pressure, etc), lost over 100 lbs and nearly finished University with a near 4.0. My story is not atypical. Your illusions of conniving drug addicts scurrying around some seedy drug den are fantasy. I see couples in their 80's, young men in several different company jumpsuits/workshirts (including several that I know are "drug-free"), middle aged women driving expensive cars and horribly crippled and disable victims of any number of injuries and illnesses. I am a longtime veteran of the post 9/11 conflicts, and many of my brothers-in-arms have turned to MMJ and away from booze and handfulls of anti-anxiety and antidepressant pills to deal with the two, four or ten deployments to warzones we get the privilege of visiting. These men and women, in almost every case, have been able to re-enter "normal" lives - now relatively free of the PTSD extremes or combat injury agonies. Yet, the best response to my needs and the needs of so many others is "I CAN'T STAND THE SMOKE AND I DON'T LIKE THOSE PLACES". Well, you know what places I don't like? Balad, Iraq... and Kyrgyzstan... and Kabul. But we went and took it for the team. The MMJ community DID NOT want a vote on this. The vote came from the Board - after they DECREED, without polling their constituency, TOTAL CLOSURE of our dispensary community. That's tantamount to saying blacks wanted a Senatorial vote on the 15th Amendment. There shouldn't even have been a vote. So, for all of you who "voted" for no purpose than to simply destroy the levels of peace and comfort tens of thousands of citizens enjoyed just a few days ago, how is your life "better"? 24 new boarded up buildings? That helps "clean up"? Good. However, NOTHING positive comes out of this for us. This is no compromise. This is the face of a ruling class, plain and simple. Shameful.

Aroused - 6/7/2012 4:34 PM
0 Votes
@Murph56 at least the people that bought from the shops were doing so legally, to even get the card you have to pass a medical exam. Though with your comment about not wanting smoke to come over your fence into your yard is a profound statement you believe moving the "legal" shops will prevent it? You must be very close-minded as there are now going to be even more drug dealers in town doing much more harm than a legal shop could do. Good job Kern county, you just made it easier for drug dealers to make profit!

51982 - 6/7/2012 2:58 PM
1 Vote
Yes I do smoke it! Also there are state laws and Ca. isn't the only state that legalized marijuana. So Paranah it's still medically legal so start complaining about all these bars all over with people piled up smoking cigarettes outside also, or all these gang bangers shooting people left and right!
Bakersfield Current Conditions
61° High: 75°  |  Low: 49°
Clear
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.