Locals react to County Clerk's decision to stop performing marriage ceremonies

Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 6/05/2008 6:48 pm
There was more fallout from the decision by the Kern County Clerk's Office to stop performing weddings at the county building.

Some members of the clergy and the gay and lesbian community are questioning the clerk's motivation for making that decision.

County Clerk Ann Barnett made the announcement Wednesday after California's highest court refused to set aside its decision legalizing same-sex marriages.

Barnett said she'll comply with the court's ruling and will issue gender-neutral marriage licenses beginning June 17, but the county clerk will no longer officiate any weddings at the Clerk's Office.

She cites budgetary problems and security as reasons for her decision.

Whitney Weddell is chairman of a local gay-lesbian advocacy group, and she's skeptical of Barnett's decision.

"Seems like they threw a little temper tantrum and so if they're now going to have to do same-sex weddings, they're just not going to do any," said Weddell.

Reverand Chuck Cournyea of Unity Church of Bakersfield said the decision to stop officiating weddings at the county building is curious.

They don't lose money on weddings," said Cournyea. "They make money, about $38 a ceremony."

Barnett couldn't be reached for comment, but whatever her motivations, her decision means busy days ahead for Unity Church.

Weddell said she plans to provide same-sex couples with a clergyman or justice of the peace to perform weddings outside the county building.

As it stands right now, gays and lesbians can legally get married in Kern County beginning June 17.
Share
8 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of KGET TV 17 - In the Spirit of the Golden Empire

amoradocat - 6/7/2008 11:21 AM
And ignorance continues in Kern County, how sad.

mamak - 6/6/2008 8:54 PM
Thank You Ann Barnett for not caving in to the gay agenda.

ShellaGulab - 6/6/2008 5:28 PM
Huge staning ovation for Ms. Barnett standing her ground. I feel that her reasons that she gave are true. But I am happy that she is not cowering down to the coersion gay community like most people feel they have to to be "politically correct". Though apprehensive to say most people do feel that gaydom is wrong and are sick of it being forced down our throats. Ms. Barnett is a strong and awesome woman. Too bad that there were not more like her in our upper an local govenment as I feel the country would not have ran down the toilet as it has. Thank you Ms. Barnett!

Laeticia32 - 6/6/2008 1:55 PM
Good for her. Kern County could certainly use one less bigot in its government. One's religion should have no bearing whatsoever on one's job, particularly if said job involves upholding LAWS. Refusing to serve homosexuals simply because they're homosexual (based on logic derived from one's religious beliefs) is discriminatory and WRONG. If she really wants to deny people the right to marriage based on what Christianity tells her is wrong, she should consider turning away divorced people who want to remarry. Last I checked, divorce was "wrong," too. Good riddance to her.

KKing - 6/6/2008 11:14 AM
Good for her!! She is smart, and if this helps even just a little bit with preventing some gay marriages, then God Bless her. Thank you.

redumbrella - 6/6/2008 8:58 AM
I don't care what motivates the Clerk to stop performing marriages. Even if she's doing it solely because she is opposed to homosexual unions, she has that right. People will always have to take small steps to move forward when facing big changes in our societal structure. This was the case for racial integration, which is still a war being fought in many areas of our great nation, and homosexual partners will face a similar uphill battle to gain acceptance. With regards to the sanctity of marriage, divorce IS rampant. People already have little respect for marriage. If homosexual partners want to prove their committment to each other by legalizing their union, then they are making a positive move. And for those that claim religion when opposing this movement, when did God give you the right to impose judgement? Just sit back and relax. If you truly have faith, and are not just using God as your platform for moral judgement on others, then you should be happy with your own life and stop worrying about others that you will never associate with. Homosexuality is not contagious, and will not spread through your congregation or steal your loved ones.

equality - 6/5/2008 10:36 PM
I support the county clerk in this decision. As the Clerk she has a choice of not allowing any couple to couple to marry in the county building. This, I feel, is non discriminatory. Now if an individual company were not going to allow a homosexual marriage to happen, it’s that at their own risk. The discrimination that this county has kept hidden is ridiculous. This issue is of equality not morals. Do people in this world believe that interracial relationships are disgusting? Of course. Other say love sees no color. I think the real line should say love sees no boundaries. If you do not condone homosexuality then don't practice it. And for the people who say “What about the sanctity of marriage is at jeopardy,” my question is how many divorces have you had?

rnzachery - 6/5/2008 9:13 PM
Well it seems to me that the law says they have to provide the license. If they're personally against it then they have every right to say "Hey, I'm not going to perform this ceremony". There's no way i'd do it. Wouldn't want that on my consience.
Bakersfield Current Conditions
61° High: 63°  |  Low: 54°
Partly Cloudy
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.