Lawmakers want Governor Brown to repeal new fire fee

Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 2/05 6:20 pm
More than two dozen lawmakers are asking Governor Jerry Brown to repeal the state's new fire fee, after thousands of Kern County residents were forced to pay it.

The push comes after new reports surfaced that Cal Fire hid millions of dollars in a non-profit account, not disclosed to the state.

Some groups are calling the fee an illegal tax. It has generated more than $80 million from across the state. Nearly $4 million of that came from Kern County residents.

Those in rural areas started receiving bills in mid-August, $150 owed to the state for a fire prevention fee.

But, after both the Los Angeles Times and The Wall Street Journal reported the State Department of Forestry hid $3.6 million, many lawmakers were outraged.

The reports show Cal Fire used $33,000 on a Pismo Beach conference trip and $600,000 on 26 evidence sheds and 600 digital cameras.

That money should have been deposited in the state's general fund, and some lawmakers want taxpayers' money returned.

"They cannot put money into a secret fund. Have it administered off the state books by the county District Attorney's Association. That's almost criminal, and what we are concerned about is this administration hasn't shown any appetite to go after their department heads or their departments. So, we want an outside agency to investigate this because we feel that taxpayers have been misled," said Senate Republican Leader, Bob Huff.

Cal Fire Spokesman Daniel Berlant says allegations that this money was hidden are false.

State Senator Jean Fuller calls the hidden money disturbing, saying residents should not have to pay more when Cal Fire has extra money lying around that has been hidden from the public.

The Howard Jarvis Taxpayer's Association has filed a lawsuit against Cal Fire calling the fee an illegal tax.

The California Department of Finance has started an audit that's expected to take about two months.
Share
3 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of KGET TV 17 - In the Spirit of the Golden Empire

Quando - 2/7/2013 6:00 AM
0 Votes
@old fart. If I were to accept your argument, which is not unreasonable, that urban dwellers should not have to pay extra for rural fire-fighting, than surely you agree that rural residents should not have to pay for the high urban crime rate-which costs millions more each year in direct and indirect government expenditures.

Oldfart - 2/6/2013 9:20 AM
1 Vote
There is no reason the people in the larger cities should cover the cost of the people in the mountain areas, if one wish to live in area which will cost much more respone to a fire then they should pay the price! They could do like some and not pay so when something happen and the fire department sets back and watch their home go up in flames and their insurance companies refuses to cover the lost like back east they can set and cry about it!

dcooper - 2/5/2013 8:14 PM
0 Votes
Governor Brown will you sign the petition to repeal SBX211. Government bribing judges. Please sign petition to stop bribes to judges. SBX211 HISTORY OF RETRO ACTIVE IMMUNITY IN THE UNITED STATES 1. given for illegal merger of large banks in 1965 (we can see the effects of that now) 2. given for unconstitutional use of torture 3. given to telecom company for illegal wire taps. (Fisa bill that led to the patriot act) 4. given to Judges for taking bribes. (SBX211) Ted Kennedy back in 1965 in regards to the illegal merger of six large banks. Quote: ""The very idea of “retroactive immunity” for lawbreaking corporations is so radical, so repugnant to the most basic principles of the “rule of law,”"
Bakersfield Current Conditions
66° High: 82°  |  Low: 54°
Clear
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.