Lawmaker pushes to repeal Family Cap law

Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 2/14 6:42 pm

For nearly two decades, women who get pregnant while on the CalWORKS program, continue to be denied more money after the baby's birth.

But, a Los Angeles Assembly member wants to repeal the Family Cap law, saying it's unfair to the mother and unborn child.

Assembly member Holly Mitchell introduced AB 271 last week. She says the controversial law leads to child poverty and needs to be repealed.

"I don't want to be on welfare myself. I want to work on my own and help my baby," said Belen Fregoso, who applied for the CalWORKS program. "Right now I don't have a job. I can't work. I'm pregnant. That's why I'm asking for help."

Fregoso is seven and a half months pregnant with her first child, about to become a single mother.

On Thursday, she applied for the CalWORKS program at the Department of Human Services.

"I want to find my own job and work on my own and help my baby. I don't want to depend on them."

But for now, she has to, and says sometimes the money isn't enough.

Under the current Family Cap law, if Fregoso were to get pregnant with a second child, she would be denied more money from the CalWORKS program.

"There's other services that they would be eligible for, such as WIC, which helps to supplement the food and nutrition for the baby and the mother," said Pam Holiwell with the Department of Human Services.

Last week, Assembly member Holly Mitchell introduced AB 271, which would repeal the Family Cap law.

"I think it's just horribly unfair that children are penalized and not given every opportunity we can give them to thrive and do well. And, the Family Cap is a policy I felt needed to be changed," said Mitchell.

Mitchell says repealing the law would help children living in poverty.

"My goal is to simply address the rate of poverty in California and give all children the recourses they need to be successful."  

According to the Department of Human Services, there are currently 20,351 CalWORKS cases, serving 51,796 people, 81 percent of which are children.

Holiwell says if the law is repealed, cash grants would increase by approximately by $100.

AB 271 now heads to committee for approval.

Share
10 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of KGET TV 17 - In the Spirit of the Golden Empire

Girl4God - 2/15/2013 4:30 PM
4 Votes
I realize not everyone on assistance is working the system. I myself was briefly on CalWorks but got a job after only a few months and never went back. However, I think some serious changes need to be made because too many use children to get more money. In my opinon, anyone receiving any monetary assistance should be made to work part time in the fields, doing community clean ups, etc. to help supplement their income and give back to the community. Shift some of the money from direct cash payments to vouchers for transportation (to get to job interviews, search for employment, etc.) and vouchers for child care so parents can search for jobs without having to bring their kids. All benefits should be restricted to a certain time period. I'm just tired of working as hard as I do to support not only my family but also those who don't want to work for themselves. That sets such a bad example to the children in those families. PS- Through my job and volunteer work I have come to know dozens of poor and homeless citizens who have said to my face "why should I get a job when I can live on the streets (or government housing), get free meals and free health care and not have to answer to anybody?" I'm not simply assuming stereotypes are true, I see it daily.

Anonymous - 2/15/2013 8:49 AM
3 Votes
after 2nd child she should be fixed so she has no more kid's. Better for unborn kids. Also if dad around fix him too

SATC3456 - 2/15/2013 8:47 AM
3 Votes
I agree with the other people, that this is not the childs fault in any way. I believe this is the parents fault. They need to teach them about this other government sponsored program called Planned Parenthood, who provide birth control for little to no money. I think it was a joke that they interviewed a soon to be single mother, who doesn't have a job, but she doesn't want to live off our government. Please!! If anything, they need to get the deadbeat to pay child support, regardless if he wants to be in that childs life. Personally, I think that they need to stop all these programs and use the money to make these deadbeats take care of their children!! Also, they need to limit the number of children that these people are going to be having. They can't take care of the 7 they have, but they are pregnant with baby #8. It sounds cruel, but these people need to be sterilized!!

Oldfart - 2/15/2013 6:53 AM
4 Votes
How about pushing a bill to make it a crime to keep having kids if you're a deadbeat! Make it a law that if these women can't support the kids they got then they get fixed or cut off for life!

2carpoor - 2/14/2013 10:36 PM
5 Votes
As a result of entitlement and lack of consequences, we now find ourselves facing these dilemnas. It's not the babys fault. BOTH parents should be working to support the baby. Unfortunately, skirting the system is a win-win for the mommy and daddy. It's not the Ritz, nor is it living-under-the-bridge. Feed/shelter them and they will come. Consequences need to be learned before the age of conception.

Dcontreras22 - 2/14/2013 9:59 PM
8 Votes
Start using these women for clean up work in and around county buildings or some other kind of labor that would help repay the money they bleeding from us the tax payers. This money is not a right, it's a privelage and a loan from us the tax payers. It's that the politicians stop treating our hard earned money as if it's monopoly money. Put those women and men to work, get them of their lazy butts and keep them out of wal-mart riding those poor electric motor buggies.

nevergiveup - 2/14/2013 9:23 PM
7 Votes
So I ask, where is Huggie Boy, the “man” responsible for the other set of chromosomes? Why is he not hit up with child support instead of the taxpayers?

georgieboy - 2/14/2013 7:48 PM
7 Votes
Oh my! You have no job, no husband, and no means of support? Yet, you decide this is a terrific time to have a baby? I question your ability to reason. And this so called lawmaker thinks it's unfair to punish the child? I agree. Give this baby to someone who has some sense!

Paranah - 2/14/2013 7:45 PM
5 Votes
A female can not support the kids she already has so she gets pregnant again so she can not work and expects more tax payer money given to her as a reward? Surprise, surprise there's women working while pregnant, but the difference is, they are not leaches expecting to live off the tax payers.

proudamerican - 2/14/2013 7:38 PM
5 Votes
So, WIC already provides the extra money for second, and subsequent children, but this lawmaker is pushing to give even more taxpayer money away. Boy, am I shocked. Taxpayers are getting stretched to the brink, and our elected officials are on a spending spree with our money!!!
Bakersfield Current Conditions
83° High: 95°  |  Low: 59°
Clear
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.