High-Speed Rail survives critical vote; construction could begin soon

Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 7/06/2012 11:39 pm

Supporters of high-speed rail in California are rejoicing, after the Senate put its stamp of approval Friday on a multi-billion dollar funding package to help begin the construction of the actual rail line.  

The Assembly approved the measure one day earlier.  It now heads to Governor Jerry Brown, who is expected to sign it in to law.  

The bill provides almost $8 billion in funding for the first stretch of the rail – a 130-mile line from Madera to Bakersfield. 

About $6 billion of that $8 billion is allocated for the design and construction of the line as well as the necessary acquisition of certain lands along the rail route.  

The remaining $2 billion will go toward fixing existing transportation systems all across the state.  For instance, some of that money will go toward improving Metrolink commuter lines in Los Angeles.   

Sen. Michael Rubio (D – Shafter) says now is the best time to start building because interest rates are low and the project will help create jobs.  

“Now is a time when we have so many individuals in the construction industry that will be put to work and be able to provide better for their families,” he said.  “So when I look at those two indicators, I couldn’t think of a better time to build high-speed rail.” 

According to the state’s High Speed Rail Authority, five different companies are in the process of bidding for rights to build parts of the 130-mile Madera to Bakersfield line.   

The Authority will choose a winner in December, according to its website, with construction to begin soon after.  The site also lists April 2016 as the projected completion date for the first stretch of high-speed rail.  

But, Rep. Shannon Grove (R – Bakersfield) says construction might be halted by litigation.  She says some farmers in the Central Valley, who could be displaced by the rail, might sue to stop the acquisition of their property.  

“I think it’ll result in a lot more battles.  I really do believe it will be litigated,” said Grove.  “There are a lot of farmers that this proposed rail line is supposed to go through, and they’re not happy about it.” 

Grove voted against the funding as did Sen. Jean Fuller (R – Bakersfield).   

Fuller criticized fellow legislators, saying they rushed into the vote and pledged too much money.  

“So, here we are committing ourselves to a huge project we probably do not have the money for. And, certainly we don't have a plan that we believe in or we think can be completed,” she said.  

There is currently no money earmarked to build the rest of the project, which includes several hundred more miles of rail and is slated to connect Los Angeles and San Francisco 

The estimated cost to complete the entire line, including the 130-mile stretch between Madera and Bakersfield, is about $68 billion.

Share
11 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of KGET TV 17 - In the Spirit of the Golden Empire

murph56 - 7/9/2012 6:51 AM
1 Vote
Sure this High speed rail would be great if they had the money to build it, since they do not have it all why not start with building the first section from Bakersfield to Los Angeles? Go right through the mountain and give the people in the valley a way in and out of LA easyer and it would benefit the valley!

ginny - 7/8/2012 8:48 AM
3 Votes
Let's try and look at this in a fiscally responsible way. The Project does not have full funding for the first 130 mile portion, let alone for the entire project. The State has a small amount of money in the existing project bucket, the Feds are providing another small amount into that bucket. Now the State has to sell bonds to get the remaining monies for the first 130 miles. The Feds have cearly stated that they make NO guarantees that there will be additional funding for the remaining miles of the project, and the State still has to come up with their remaining funds to complete the whole thing. AND they added non-High Speed Rail Projects into the mix to get it passed. Yet, all the while the State of CA is moving closer and closer to being insolvent. We do not have the revenue to maintain what we already have but hey, let's keep coming up with unfunded projects the Gov and Legslature will just ask us to vote for new taxes, fees, and increases in existing taxes. I have to say, I think FL, OH, WI got it right when they turned their High Speed Rail funds back to the Feds when they realized what it was going to cost each of their States and saw this as one big loser project.

SteveC - 7/8/2012 7:48 AM
5 Votes
Hey, when you're broke and on the verge of bankruptcy the answer is to SPEND, SPEND, and SPEND some more. Right?

SteveC - 7/8/2012 7:45 AM
1 Vote
The lawyers would love to suck someone, anyone, dry in the "litigation" that may follow. Like a parasite they impose themseles into every aspect of life in the US.

dolphins - 7/7/2012 10:18 PM
3 Votes
I bet ANYONE rght now, that ALL the jobs go to illegal MEXICANS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Makesense - 7/7/2012 9:55 PM
3 Votes
This rail project is silly and a waste of federal tax dollars. Pay attention right wingers because i just gave you an opinion from a liberal. Yes, liberals actually think this way too sometimes! I believe the funds could be better spent on other projects to create jobs. I live in Kern County and work here. If i want a job in SF i would live there! This is one Obama idea i believe is just rediculous and a waste.

bellazo - 7/7/2012 7:07 PM
2 Votes
our state is in debt,there are no jobs,money is being taken from our schools,programs for seniors and children cut,most PEOPLE in california are having a hard time feeding their families,and our GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE in SACRAMENTO decide what we need is a bullet train and that will FIX all of our PROBLEMS

Saratoga - 7/7/2012 12:19 PM
3 Votes
Great idea ..... 25 years too late. Just what jobs are the passengers going to?

ruffy - 7/7/2012 11:37 AM
1 Vote
This is going to be one of those cost-overrun projects that will eat up far more money than estimated, a prevailing-wage job that will pay an unskilled labored $40 an hour to stand and watch people work, and why, oh why do we need it? I'm open minded about it, but right now I can't see the need. And Lancerandol, you GOTTA be a liberal dem, the evidence being Kevin McCarthy is the best congressman we ever had. And FYI Union Pacific already owns the rail, a private company that moves more freight that you can imagine and what they don't need is impediment.

Lancerandol - 7/7/2012 10:06 AM
0 Votes
It is not just farmers it is big big money and slow thinking people who want graft and bribes building contractors and county officials who are not getting their palms greased properly and the current railroad system who wants to control the rail it is the rich It is the big landowners and it is also the farmers who do not want this because they will never use it The people want to be in the modern age and in America if we are not leading the way at least let us keep up Where is your pride Kern county in the past Would you all like to live in the 1950,s again Kern County officials are a bunch of backwards thinking hicks like McCarthy vote him out next time you have a chance Every backwards republican politician vote them out
Bakersfield Current Conditions
83° High: 94°  |  Low: 62°
Clear
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.