Congressman Kevin McCarthy and Terry Phillips debate before on KGET

Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 10/11/2012 6:42 pm

Election day is less than a month away. KGET is trying to make 'decision day' a little easier by hosting a series of debates with the candidates. The only debate between incumbent Republican Congressman Kevin McCarthy and Independent challenger, Terry Phillips, will air this weekend. Both are running for the newly drawn 23rd Congressional District seat.

Moderated by 17's Jim Scott and Tami Mlcoch, the debate drew out the candidates' differences during the first subject, locking horns over the economy.

"We have to end the uncertainty to build a small business with access to capitol, argued Rep. Kevin McCarthy. "That's one of the bills I was able to pass this year of mine in the Jobs Act that the President actually signed. That's what we have to do to change course."

"I see the long-term solution to our economic problems right here at home in education," argued Phillips. "And, Mr. McCarthy voted to cut pell grants by 40 percent. I think that these policies have led to not only uncertainty, but increased unemployment."

Phillips often went after the Congressman's party affiliation during the debate.

"That's why I say my opponent is the problem as a leader of his party," said Phillips. "He puts party interest before our country's interest."

Meantime, the Congressman expressed his experience and questioned Phillips' validity.

"I like to have a debate, but I like to have a debate of facts, Terry," said the Congressman.

17 News Political Analysts Gene Tackett and Cathy Abernathy brought their own questions to the table. And, the candidates tackled other topics such as water, the budget, immigration, and high speed rail.

"High speed rail has a lot of pluses," said Phillips. "It has some challenges too. But, the fact is, this is something that will help us tremendously and not just here in the Central Valley. It will help the whole state."

"If you build this train and you go to bonds, you are going to have to cut the education system," said Congressman McCarthy. "So, if you want to cut schools to build a train that won't finish the process."

There were many differing views from the candidates, both hoping to win enough votes to win the newly drawn 23rd Congressional District seat.

"That's how I have learned to solve problems, by listening to people by being here when it matters," said Phillips.

"I'm not going to change my appearance," said Congressman McCarthy. "I'm not going to change my patriotism for my country just to run for office. And, I'm definitely not going to make up facts to hope you'll vote for me."

The McCarthy-Phillips debate is one-hour long. You can see it in its entirety Sunday night, October 14th on TV-17, immediately following Sunday night football around 8:30 p.m.

Share
4 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of KGET TV 17 - In the Spirit of the Golden Empire

murph56 - 10/15/2012 8:34 AM
2 Votes
Kevin McCarthy may not be doing the greatest job but he is trying and has done a lot for the people, as for Terry Phillips did anyone really listen to this guy? I'm an Independent and no way would I vote for this guy!

whatisthetruth - 10/14/2012 2:53 PM
0 Votes
Write a letter to Kevin McCarthy and see what you think of him. The replies, if you get one, are a joke. Obviously no one in his office reads the letters. Look at who donates to his campaign, for example the big bailed out banks, then decide who he really works for? I don't think that he is interested in most of his constituents.

ginny - 10/12/2012 9:17 AM
2 Votes
McCarthy has done a great job for us and I see no reason to replace him. He is willing to work in a bipartisan way in Washington and has been successful in many of those efforts. He has been the main voice for the valley on trying to bring our farming back to what it used to be. As for the Pell Grant cuts, like Murph56 said, and I strongly agree, the grants should be paid directly to the schools the grant receivers are attending. My bet is that if it is made a direct to school payment that we would not see any discussion of cutting them at all because most people who get them see them as free money to spend on anything they want. With direct pay, they will loose one more way to fleece the system and we would see the requests for Pell and other grants slow down on their own.

murph56 - 10/12/2012 7:51 AM
2 Votes
I can see cutting pell grants is BS but when we have people applying for all of these grants and then never going to school after they get the money it makes it harder on the kids that really need the money. They need to apply all of these grants to the school they attend not to the student. I know a few that took the money and went out and purchsed big screens,computer and not for school work, sound systems, etc and never attended school. Now as for the kern country water the farmers are paying for their water and only getting 60% or less so their crops are dying and we are paying for it so I agree with McCarthy on getting out water back. But the day anyone in office does everything to help the people the world would sure to end the next day! It's not going to happen and unions will see to that!
Bakersfield Current Conditions
84° High: 95°  |  Low: 59°
Clear
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.