Red Flag Warning expires at 10:00 AM on 6/20, issued at 10:00 AM Maricopa, CA

BPD: "Obvious deceit" in driver’s story about texting before fatal crash

Anna Marie Reynosa
Anna Marie Reynosa
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 6/11/2012 5:10 pm
The driver at the center of Kern's first "texting-manslaughter" case told police several different stories about what she was doing with her cell phone when she allegedly plowed into a motorcycle stopped at a northwest Bakersfield intersection, according to reports released Monday.

Anna Marie Reynosa, 20, is charged with a felony count of vehicular manslaughter. She made her first court appearance Monday, surrounded by a phalanx of family and friends who tried to block media from getting a picture of her.

After she pleaded not guilty to the charge, the judge sternly warned her of the consequences of dangerous driving while she's out on bail. If convicted, she could face six years in prison.

It's believed to be the first case of its kind in Kern County.

The victim was Charla Wilkins, also 20. She was on her motorcycle, headed north on Jewetta Avenue, stopped at the stop sign at Reyna Road when she was hit from behind by the pickup traveling nearly 70 mph. She was thrown 152 feet and killed.

In reports released Monday, police say:

        -- The accident happened at 8:35 or 8:36 p.m. April 14.

        --   Reynosa made a one-minute call to someone named Tony at 8:32 p.m., three or four minutes before the accident.

        -- She got a text from her boyfriend, Blake Meyers, at that same minute, apparently while on the call with Tony.

        -- After that phone call and that text, police say, a partial text was entered on her phone. It was addressed to someone named "Nick," and said, "Hey can …" The Samsung phone does not put time stamps on unsent messages, so there's no way to know exactly when those two words were written. But, the reports say, it came after the one-minute call ended at 8:33 p.m.

        -- Reynosa said she doesn't know how the text got on her phone. She said she doesn't know anyone named "Nick" and doesn't know how his name and number got in her phone.

        -- Reynosa said she was not texting at the time of the accident. She said she noticed the blinking light on the phone, and looked down to see if she had missed a message. But, the officer pointed out, records show there was no missed call or missed text, and therefore no reason the light would be blinking.

        -- The Toyota was traveling between 63 and 68 mph when it hit the motorcycle. The speed limit is 45 mph.

        -- Reynosa already had three speeding tickets in the first three and a half months of 2012. One BPD officer who works in her neighborhood gave her two of them. He said he has seen her speeding several other times when he was unable to stop and cite her. That officer said Reynosa, "drives like a maniac."

        -- Reynosa said the truck had bad brakes, but an inspection found front and back brakes to be worn but "serviceable." And, officers said, there was no indication the brakes were used at all. "The braking system was a non-factor," the report said.

        -- Reynosa had a blood alcohol level of 0.009 percent. That would be well below the limit for a driver over the age of 21, but it is illegal for anyone under 21 to have any alcohol in her system. Reynosa told officers she drank half a Corona beer at her mother's house, without her mother knowing about it.

        "After examining the evidence at the scene of this collision, it is readily apparent that V-2 (the motorcycle) was stopped at a stop-sign facing northbound in the No. 2 northbound lane of Jewetta Avenue at Reina Road when she was struck from behind by V-1 (the Toyota) at speed, which is without any pre-collision braking on the part of P-1 (Reynosa), Officer Christopher Bagby wrote.

"There is no evidence that P-1 (Reynosa) took any action to avoid the collision.

"It is extremely likely," Bagby wrote, "especially in light of her obvious deceit when asked about it, that she was engaged in texting "Nick" at the time of this collision."

She is free on $50,000 bail.

She has declined a Channel 17 request for an interview.
 

Share
22 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of KGET TV 17 - In the Spirit of the Golden Empire

anonymous - 3/15/2013 6:11 PM
0 Votes
heres how i see it .. out of all of you people who are posting negative comments and even those who agree with my statement, how many of you have ever looked down at their phone while driving? and be honest really think about it. not only that but how many of you have took your eyes off of the road for any reason at all? when i first heard of this story i thought to myself i would never text and drive or be distracted by anything at all while driving because the life of an individually was taken because of a terrible accident. but exactly that it an accident that could happen to anyone . until recently when i was rear ended and hit from behind by a tennager texting and drving, i was injured and realized it was in fact an accident it was because of a careless mistake that was made until i looked around and saw many others distracted by cell phones hair combs and even one shaving his face. everybody makes mistakes and yes it is very sad about the girl who was killed but you should really step back and relate this to your own life and be happy it wasnt you driving behind charla...

jodeno - 6/18/2012 10:47 AM
1 Vote
Sure most of us have sped, but how many of us have actually killed someone? This girl has had how many speeding tickets, 2, 3? And that still didn't stop her from driving like a maniac, according to one police officer who has stopped her for speeding. You'd think she would have learned then to drive RIGHT, but no, she decided to speed AGAIN, while TEXTING! And then she killed someone! And I bet she STILL doesn't care! I see her picture in the paper and that is not the face of remorse. She seems only to care about herself, her and her entourage.... I also think she should get more than 6 years, but I know that IF she is convicted, she'd most likely get less than half. Will her license be taken away? Probably not. She's had it for less than a year, already has multiple speeding convictions, has KILLED SOMEBODY, and still she may get to keep her license. I hope not, Bakersfield is already full of psycho drivers as it is. It's funny, I see anti-texting signs on the freeway, "$159, not worth it," yet I never see any cops....? So, who gives them the ticket? Anyways, she'll most likely get probabtion or community service, something stupid like that. I DO NOT feel sorry for her or her family.

Csuperg03 - 6/15/2012 12:29 PM
0 Votes
Everyone is so quick to judge and act like no one on here who has made a comment has never sped in their life. Who ever is free from sin cast the first stone. I feel sorry for both families. One has lost a family member and the other family has to live with the consequences. Both families need prayer to overcome what has happened to them. As a community we should be keeping both families in our prayers instead of judging and critizing.

murph56 - 6/13/2012 6:37 AM
1 Vote
Sure charge her with everything, then with our new system here in Kern she will be back driving in less than a year.

RVLADY - 6/12/2012 5:53 PM
0 Votes
She should be tryed by a jury & Jury should decide her sentence! Bet she would spend a longggggg time in prison

Paranah - 6/12/2012 11:32 AM
3 Votes
Taking her license while she's out on bail won't stop her from driving. I think the DUI should have been included in the charges as well as speeding and failing to stop at the stop sign. Be more difficult for her to beat all the charges.

dolphins - 6/12/2012 11:03 AM
2 Votes
Even if they gave her 6 years, here in California, with the over crowding, she would only end up doing 2 years. Think about that, 2 years for destroying a family, and ending the life of a beautiful person. We should NOT stand by and let this happen. We should ALL show up for her next court date, and DEMAND justice. She should get life without!!!!

mamak - 6/12/2012 10:49 AM
5 Votes
This girl deserves everything that is coming to her. She sounds like an out-of-control, spoiled brat! She, obviously has no regard for others. Again, I hope she gets the book thrown at her fiercely!!

bchris703 - 6/12/2012 9:53 AM
1 Vote
I see these types of drivers everyday.Gosford rd is like a race track 55mph with stop lights and people drive 70mph like its the freeway..This girl is lying threw her teeth,and her parents need to pull her to the side have a nice talk with her about real life and then tell her to woman up and tell the truth and except the consequences of her actions..If not by them just covering for her or letting her embarrass herself,this behavoir of hers will only get worse not better....

ginny - 6/12/2012 7:02 AM
3 Votes
While this woman is awaiting trial the State DMV should revoke her license for alteast 15 years, so that she cannot put anyones life at risk. That's the least that should be done based only on her current driving record. She's 20 years old and already has a disgraceful record. I'm 61 years old and have never gotten a single ticket and have never been in an accident. Not saying I'm a perfect driver, but this chic is a lost cause already in my opinion. Driving is not a right, it is a privilage. And people need to remember that driving means driving, not multi-tasking, no phone, texting, putting on makeup, reading a e-mail, etc. Driving is a primary task that takes all of your attention.
Bakersfield Current Conditions
65° High: 89°  |  Low: 54°
Clear
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.