Bakersfield man fights websites exposing DUI checkpoints

Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 4/18/2012 6:40 pm

A Bakersfield man who lost his wife to a teenage drunk driver, is fed up with websites exposing the locations of DUI checkpoints.  Michael Benge says Thursday was a painful reminder of why he continues his fight against drunk driving.

It was a particularly tough day for Benge, searching for comfort in a place he thought he would never visit. "I stop here and talk to her fairly regularly. Today would have been her birthday," explained Benge.

Benge's wife Jada would have turned 41 on Thursday. Her life was cut tragically short by a teenage drunk driver who hit the Benge family head-on at 95 miles per hour, nearly eight years ago. "The girl who was driving, 17, had a .20 blood alcohol level so she was nearly three times the legal limit for an adult. It killed my wife almost instantly, watched her take her last breaths," explained Benge.

Police said the teen driver was already on probation for a DUI. "My little girls' screams. Just agony. It was awful," he remembered about that day.

Benge has made it his mission to stop this from happening to another family. He said websites that post DUI checkpoint locations make it more difficult.

23-year-old Sennett Devermont of San Diego owns www.mrcheckpoint.com. It is an online service that e-mails or text messages checkpoint locations. "I do not support drunk driving. I don't think anyone does. I use it as a way to deter people from drinking and driving," said Devermont.

Devermont says he started the website after he was handcuffed and detained when he refused to answer questions or take a field sobriety test at a DUI checkpoint. He said he was later released after passing a breath test.

"The courts have outlined specific parameters for the checkpoints and they have to be followed. More often than not, innocent people are lied to about their rights and end up wrongfully arrested," he continued.

Devermont says checkpoints unfairly harass innocent drivers.

"I hear people that say they are inconvenienced, I just don't want to have to go through one. Someone says I'm going to drive around it and they go hit someone else. Who's liable? The blood would be on Devermont's hands, symbolically," said Benge.

Benge wants to prevent another drunk driving death, after spending the last eight years raising three daughters on his own. He continues to tell his story so no one else will be left alone on a loved one's birthday.

Share
13 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of KGET TV 17 - In the Spirit of the Golden Empire

ruffy - 4/21/2012 12:47 AM
0 Votes
murph has nothing to fear, I get his point. I am the same way. I have nothing to fear from a checkpoint. All documents valid and accessible, I have not a a drink since 2001, car in tip-top shape....checkpoints...bring 'em on. Actually I have been a bit miffed when I get waved through and not stopped, once I was visiting my son and he lives on a military base, he was in the car with me so he had proper ID to get on base, (besides they know him) and when the MP held us up to do the dog search, which they do at random, I was more fascinated than nervous. The use two different dogs, one trained for dope and the other for explosives, which of course I had neither and the MP's and I had a very nice conversation.

BiggJim - 4/20/2012 4:53 PM
0 Votes
JimCee has it right on the Money, Its not about dodging the cops, its about your goverment wanting to control everything you do. They are taking your rights one by one.

murph56 - 4/19/2012 9:20 AM
2 Votes
I do not drink and drive, I have a drivers license, I keep my car tagged, I keep my insurance up to date and a card in the car, I keep my car safe for the road with all the lights working, windshield unbroken, tires with thread on them and the brakes work. When I get stopped in a checkpoint I have no problem with the police and they have no problem with me. I have seen people have problem at these sites only because they bring it upon themselves. If you can not follow the rules of the road and be safe I for one do not want you on the road beside me. Thank you local law enforcement Keep up the good work.Now the local police do have a few problems in the way they run the department but I agree with these checkpoints and desagree with this warning site for drunks to go around them.

kknjtg - 4/19/2012 8:48 AM
0 Votes
These check points will stop a drunk driver, common since will. They only use DUI, to continue this controlled torment. This is just another way to make money. The city and state can care less what happens to others on the road. If I were to avoid these things it would be for the reason of harassment. My children don't need to see this. I don't brake laws.

Mr Green - 4/19/2012 7:28 AM
2 Votes
JimCee, I'm sure your stance would change if a tragedy like this were to happen to you. You are a complete idiot!

JimCee - 4/19/2012 1:14 AM
2 Votes
It's not about convenience. It's not about "dodging the cops". This is about resisting a government AND social push to make Constitutional rights a commodity that the American citizen has to barter away in exchange for our freedom one transaction at a time. "Want to be able to drive? Great! You just will have no protection against government search and seizure!" And before the whole "driving is a PRIVILEGE, not a RIGHT!!!" rhetoric starts oozing down the walls, consider this: fornicating with your spouse is a privilege as well - one that requires licensing (marriage license). Quit trying so hard to figure out ways to justify submitting to an authoritarian government....

MrCheckpoint - 4/18/2012 10:49 PM
2 Votes
I am very sorry for Mr. Benge's loss. Clearly losing a loved one is a horrible experience and for it to happen so suddenly and unnecessarily must make it that much harder. I do not support drunk driving. I don't think anyone does. I have used the promoting of checkpoints as a way to deter people from drinking and driving. Beverly Hills police have publicly supported MrCheckpoint on local news. The response from my subscribers show just how effective my service is in deterring people from drinking and driving. Sergio De la Torre – “I just threw my keys to the homie only because MrCheckpoint put me on my game #NeverDUI” Melissa Rasberry - “if MrCheckpoint existed back in 1987 @MrCheckpoint probably couldve saved my mom's life! killed by a drunk driver DONT DRINK & DRIVE! #NeverDUI” Jennifer - “#fortherecord I don't drink & drive. But checkpoints are just another way for the police to search us without probable cause. F that!” The fact that driving under the influence is a crime causing danger does not excuse unchecked and abused police authority. The courts have outlined specific parameters for a checkpoint to exist and stated they must be followed for a checkpoint to be legal. More often than not, these requirements are ignored. Often at checkpoints INNOCENT and sober drivers are lied to about their rights and told they cannot remain silent and have to perform field sobriety tests and the failure to answer questions will wind them up wrongfully arrested. A motorist who has given no sign of intoxication should be able to drive from place to place without being taken out of a car, interrogated, asked to do acrobatics, and have his insides searched via a chemical tests by people with cuffs and guns.

MrCheckpoint - 4/18/2012 10:49 PM
1 Vote
As I said before, I don't support drunk driving and feel people who are driving under the influence should be arrested and taken off the road immediately. I also feel for everyone who is a victim of drunk driving. I also feel for the endless amounts of innocent people who are harassed, lied to, delayed, and often thrown in a jail cell for what could be days only to come back with a .00 blood alcohol result as I can relate to from experience. If my website helps to preserve rights that should not be taken away, than my website it working. It's purpose is not to keep drunk drivers on the road, but to preserve our freedoms. This is not a case of the lesser of two evils where either we let drunk drivers drive or we give up our rights. There is a way, if the police follow the laws, both can be done effectively. Best, Sennett Devermont MrCheckpoint

LeeMcM - 4/18/2012 10:04 PM
1 Vote
Actually, by California law the police are required to publicly announce the checkpoint time, location, and duration days before. The people that spread the information around are doing what the cops have already done, but on a bigger level. If you get mad at the websites that "expose" already announced checkpoint locations, then you have to get mad at the police, California law, and really yourself for voting for the law (if you're old enough) and/or doing nothing to try and change the law. If you are really against it, go get a lawyer, get the required amount of signatures and get that train moving. Unless a drunk driver is proven to have wrongfully utilized a site like mrcheckpoint and killed someone after avoiding the checkpoints, you cannot blame the site for helping anyone. It just doesn't follow. Anyone doing 95mph or driving like a psycho doesn't need a checkpoint to get caught; That's what we pay the rest of the traffic cops to do. I used to drink drive pretty often, but I never felt drunk or impaired. Drinking two beers after work didn't and doesn't seem like a big deal to me, but when my phone is buzzing with the locations of landmines my first instinct isn't to try and pinball my way home; Most people would decide against driving at all, and that is what I do now. I don't think checkpoint location websites promote or help irresponsible people drink and drive. I think these websites/texts remind people multiple times a night of the police presence on the road and act more as a deterrent than an aid. People that are hammered and driving can't read a text and don't have the mental wherewithall to map out a way home using the exposed locations. Murpho56, either call 911 like you are supposed to or start up your own website. Everyone has camera phones nowadays and the public harassment might also be a good deterrent. Good idea!

RobtAlan1 - 4/18/2012 9:29 PM
1 Vote
I see the articles where they list the checkpoints, but I honestly believe people who get drunk and drive probably aren't reading the articles and if there are people so inclined they could just take side streets to avoid checkpoints. I solved the problem long ago. I quit drinking.
Bakersfield Current Conditions
70° High: 83°  |  Low: 54°
Clear
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.